Xerxes says that the function , has a horizontal asymptote of , Yolanda says the function has no horizontal asymptote, Zeb says that it does have a horizontal asymptote but it's at . Which one of them is correct?
In this concept we will touch on the different possibilities for the remaining types of rational functions. You will need to use your graphing calculator throughout this concept to ensure your sketches are correct.
Solution: In this example the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator. Whenever this happens the horizontal asymptote will be , or the -axis. Now, even though the -axis is the horizontal asymptote, there will still be a zero at (solving the numerator for and setting it equal to zero). The vertical asymptotes will be the solutions to . Factoring this quadratic, we have and the solutions are and . The -intercept is . At this point, we can plug our function into the graphing calculator to get the general shape.
Because the middle portion crosses over the horizontal asymptote, the range will be all real numbers. The domain is .
Be careful when graphing any rational function. This function does not look like the graph to the left in a TI-83/84. This is because the calculator does not have the ability to draw the asymptotes separately and wants to make the function continuous. Make sure to double-check the table ( GRAPH) to find where the function is undefined.
Solution: In this example the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator . When this happens, there is no horizontal asymptote. Instead there is a slant asymptote . Recall that this function represents division. If we were to divide by , the answer would be . The slant asymptote would be the answer, minus the remainder. Therefore,for this problem the slant asymptote is . Everything else is the same. The -intercept is and the -intercepts are the solutions to the numerator, . There is a vertical asymptote at . At this point, you can either test a few points to see where the branches are or use your graphing calculator.
Graph . Find the asymptotes and intercepts.
Solution: Because the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator, there will be a horizontal asymptote along the -axis. Next, let’s find the vertical asymptotes by factoring the denominator; . Notice that the denominator has a factor of , which is the entirety of the numerator. That means there will be a hole at .
Therefore, the graph of will be the same as except with a hole at . There is no -intercept, the vertical asymptote is at and the -intercept is .
Intro Problem Revisit The degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator . We know that whenever this happens the horizontal asymptote will be , or the -axis.
Therefore, Zeb is correct.
For a rational function;
- If , then there is a horizontal asymptote at .
- If , then there is a horizontal asymptote at (ratio of the leading coefficients).
- If , then there is a slant asymptote at without the remainder. In this concept, we will only have functions where is one greater than .
Graph the following functions. Find any intercepts and asymptotes.
1. -intercept: , -intercept:
vertical asymptotes: none
2. -intercept: , -intercept:
vertical asymptotes: and
3. -intercepts: and
4. -intercepts: none, hole at
- Slant Asymptote
- In a rational function, when the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator a slant asymptote is produced instead of a horizontal one. It is the result of long division of the function, without the remainder.
Find all asymptotes of the following functions.
- Find the x -intercepts of the function in #2.
- Find the x -intercepts of the function in #3.
Graph the following functions. Find any intercepts, asymptote and holes.
- Determine the slant asymptote of . Now, graph this function. Is there really a slant asymptote? Can you explain your results?