How would you express the following as a function?
You are supposed to mow your square-shaped lawn for your parents, but the mower only has part of a tank of gas. If you can mow 2500 sf per gallon, and the mower has approximately 2.5 gallons in it, what is the maximum length of one side of the lawn you can mow? If your lawn is 75 feet long, will you need more gas?
Quadratic inequalities are inequalities that have one of the following forms
We can solve these inequalities by using the techniques that we have learned about solving quadratic equations. For example, consider the graph of the equation:
Notice that the curve intersects the axis at -3 and 2. From graph, we notice the followings
- If then
- If , then
- If , then
Therefore, whenever or , and when .
Earlier, you were given a question about mowing a lawn.
If you can mow 2500 sf of grass per gallon of gas, and the mower has 2.5 gallons in it, what is the maximum length of one side of the lawn you can mow?
If your lawn is 75 ft long, will you need more gas?
We know that the function describes the possible side lengths of square shapes you could mow before running out of gas (if you're having trouble understanding why, see Example 4 for a similar process).
Solving for S gives:
With 2.5 gal of gas, you could mow a square up to apx 79 ft on each side.
You should not need more gas if the lawn is only 75 ft long on each side.
What is the solution set of the inequality ?
It is best to graph the function and look for the values of such that the inequality is true.
Thus from graph, only if
So the solution set is or in set builder notation,
Although the method of graphing to find the solution set of an inequality is easy to follow, another algebraic method can be used. The algebraic method involves finding the intercepts of the graph and then dividing the axis into intervals separated by the intercepts. The examples below illustrate the method.
Find the solution set of the quadratic inequality without graphing.
To find the solution set without graphing, first factor:
Recalling the zero product rule, we can see that the two solutions to this quadratic equation are and , thus, the intercepts of the function are -4 and 2.
These points divide the axis into three intervals: . We can choose a test point from each interval, substitute it into and see if the function is negative or positive with that value as x. This procedure can be simplified by making a table as shown below:
|Interval||Test Point||Is positive or negative?||Part of Solution set?|
From the table, we conclude that since if and only if and . The solution set can also be written as:
Some problems in science involve quadratic inequalities. The example below illustrates one such application.
A rectangle has a length 10 meters more than twice the width. Find all of the possible widths that result in the area of the rectangle not exceeding 100 squared meters.
Let be the width of the rectangle and its length. Given the information in the question, we can say:
Then we can use the formula for the area of a rectangle:
Substituting in for gives:
The area cannot exceed , so
Simplify by dividing both sides by 2:
Factor the trinomial:
So the partition points are 5 and -10, which means we have three intervals. Since width cannot be negative, we can safely ignore -10. That means the maximum area is
The width must be less than 5 meters.
Find the solution set of the inequality .
Set the function equal to zero:
Factor to find the critical values (points where the graph crosses the x axis, thereby changing signs):
By the zero product rule: or
That gives us three sections on the graph:
Test one sample value from each division to identify possible solution sets.
|true with value?|
Therefore the solution set is .
Graph the solution set: .
The solutions to can be identified with the rules for multiplying negative numbers:
Recall from Pre-Algebra that an even number of negatives yields a positive answer, and an odd number of negatives yields a negative answer.
Since we know we need a positive answer or zero.
Case #1: and
Case #2: and
Since any number greater than 3 is already greater than -4, from Case #1 we get:
Since any number less than -4 is already less than 3, from Case #2 we get
Therefore our answer is or
In set notation:
To graph this information, we draw a line graph, and mark the values that x can be, with solid dots on the end numbers to indicate that those values are included.
Visually that is:
Graph the solutions sets below on a number line:
Identify critical points, solve, and graph:
- (hint: multiply both sides by x first)
To see the Review answers, open this PDF file and look for section 2.9.