Calculators such as the TI-84 have a table view that allows you to make extremely educated guesses as to what the limit of a function will be at a specific point, even if the function is not actually defined at that point.

How could you use a table to calculate the following limit?

#### Watch This

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7Tcay720vw James Sousa: Determine a Limit Numerically

#### Guidance

If you were given the following information organized in a table, how would you fill in the center column?

3.9 | 3.99 | 3.999 | 4.001 | 4.01 | 4.1 | |

12.25 | 12.01 | 12.00001 | 11.99999 | 11.99 | 11.75 |

It would be logical to see the symmetry and notice how the top row approaches the number 4 from the left and the right. It would also be logical to notice how the bottom row approaches the number 12 from the left and the right. This would lead you to the conclusion that the limit of the function represented by this table is 12 as the top row approaches 4. It would not matter if the value at 4 was undefined or defined to be another number like 17, the pattern tells you that the limit at 4 is 12.

Using tables to help evaluate limits requires this type of logic. To use a table on your calculator to evaluate a limit:

- Enter the function on the
- Go to table set up and highlight “ask” for the independent variable
- Go to the table and enter values close to the number that approaches

**
Example A
**

Complete the table and use the result to estimate the limit.

1.9 | 1.99 | 1.999 | 2.001 | 2.01 | 2.1 | |

**
Solution:
**
While it is not necessary to use the table feature in the calculator, it is very efficient. Another option is to substitute the given
values into the expression
and record your results.

1.9 | 1.99 | 1.999 | 2.001 | 2.01 | 2.1 | |

0.34483 | 0.33445 | 0.33344 | 0.33322 | 0.33223 | 0.32258 |

The evidence suggests that the limit is .

**
Example B
**

Complete the table and use the result to estimate the limit.

1.9 | 1.99 | 1.999 | 2.001 | 2.01 | 2.1 | |

**
Solution:
**
You can trick the calculator into giving a very exact answer by typing in 1.999999999999 because then the calculator rounds instead of producing an error.

1.9 | 1.99 | 1.999 | 2.001 | 2.01 | 2.1 | |

0.25641 | 0.25063 | 0.25006 | 0.24994 | 0.24938 | 0.2439 |

The evidence suggests that the limit is .

**
Example C
**

Complete the table and use the result to estimate the limit.

-0.1 | -0.01 | -0.001 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.1 | |

**
Solution:
**

-0.1 | -0.01 | -0.001 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.1 | |

0.29112 | 0.28892 | 0.2887 | 0.28865 | 0.28843 | 0.28631 |

The evidence suggests that the limit is a number between 0.2887 and 0.28865. When you learn to find the limit analytically, you will know that the exact limit is .

**
Concept Problem Revisited
**

When you enter values close to -1 in the table you get values that are increasingly close to the number 1. This implies that the limit as approaches -1 is 1. Notice that when you evaluate the function at -1, the calculator produces an error. This should lead you to the conclusion that while the function is not defined at , the limit does exist.

#### Vocabulary

**
Numerically
**
is a term used to describe one of several different representations in mathematics. It refers to tables where the actual numbers are visible.

#### Guided Practice

1. Graph the following function and the use a table to verify the limit as approaches 1.

2. Estimate the limit numerically.

3. Estimate the limit numerically.

**
Answers:
**

1. . This is because when you factor the numerator and cancel common factors, the function becomes a quadratic with a hole at the point .

You can verify the limit in the table.

.75 | 2.3125 |

.9 | 2.71 |

.99 | 2.9701 |

.999 | 2.997 |

1 | Error |

1.001 | 3.003 |

1.01 | 3.0301 |

1.1 | 3.31 |

1.25 | 3.8125 |

2.
**
**

1.75 | 1.9 | 1.99 | 1.999 | 2 | 2.001 | 2.01 | 2.1 | 2.25 | |

0.75 | 0.9 | 0.99 | 0.999 | Error | 1.001 | 1.01 | 1.1 | 1.25 |

3.

-0.1 | -0.01 | -0.001 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.1 | |

0.20526 | 0.02005 | 0.002 | -0.002 | -0.02 | -0.1952 |

#### Practice

Estimate the following limits numerically.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.