Will this oil spill victim live?
After every oil spill, photos are released of marine organisms covered with oil. Sometimes people are trying to clean them. Seabirds are especially vulnerable; they dive into a slick because the surface looks like calmer water. Oil-coated birds cannot regulate their body temperatures and will die. After cleanup, some birds will live and some will not.
Large oil spills, like the Exxon Valdez in Alaska in 1989, get a lot of attention, as they should. Besides these large spills, though, much more oil enters the oceans from small leaks that are only a problem locally. In this concept, we'll take a look at a large recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
New drilling techniques have allowed oil companies to drill in deeper waters than ever before. This allows us to access oil deposits that were never before accessible, but only with great technological difficulty. The risks from deepwater drilling and the consequences when something goes wrong are greater than those associated with shallower wells.
Working on oil platforms is dangerous. Workers are exposed to harsh ocean conditions and gas explosions. The danger was never more obvious than on April 20, 2010, when 11 workers were killed and 17 injured in an explosion on a deepwater oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico (Figure below). The drilling rig, operated by BP, was 77 km (48 miles) offshore and the depth to the well was more than 5,000 feet.
The U.S. Coast Guard tries to put out the fire and search for missing workers after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig. Eleven workers were killed.
Two days after the explosion, the drill rig sank. The 5,000-foot pipe that connected the wellhead to the drilling platform bent. Oil was free to gush into the Gulf of Mexico from nearly a mile deep (Figure below). Initial efforts to cap or contain the spill at or near its source all failed to stop the vast oil spill. It was not until July 15, nearly three months after the accident, that the well was successfully capped.
Estimating the flow of oil into the Gulf from the well was extremely difficult because the leak was so far below the surface. The U.S. government estimates that about 4.9 million barrels entered the Gulf at a rate of 35,000 to 60,000 barrels a day. The largest previous oil spill in the United States was of 300,000 barrels by the Exxon Valdez in 1989 in Prince William Sound, Alaska.
(a) On May 17, 2010, oil had been leaking into the Gulf for nearly one month. On that date government estimates put the maximum total oil leak at 1,600,000 barrels, according to the New York Times. (b) The BP oil spill on June 19, 2010. The government estimates for total oil leaked by this date was 3,200,000 barrels.
Once the oil is in the water, there are three types of methods for dealing with it:
1. Removal: Oil is corralled and then burned; natural gas is flared off (Figure below). Machines that can separate oil from the water are placed aboard ships stationed in the area. These ships cleaned tens of thousands of barrels of contaminated seawater each day.
Burning the oil can reduce the amount in the water.
2. Containment: Floating containment booms are placed on the surface offshore of the most sensitive coastal areas in an attempt to attempt to trap the oil. But the seas must be calm for the booms to be effective, and so were not very useful in the Gulf (Figure below). Sand berms have been constructed off of the Louisiana coast to keep the oil from reaching shore.
A containment boom holds back oil, but it is only effective in calm water.
3. Dispersal: Oil disperses naturally over time because it mixes with the water. However, such large amounts of oil will take decades to disperse. To speed the process up, BP has sprayed unprecedented amounts of chemical dispersants on the spill. That action did not receive support from the scientific community since no one knows the risks to people and the environment from such a large amount of these harmful chemicals. Some workers may have become ill from exposure to the chemicals.
Plugging the Well
BP drilled two relief wells into the original well. When the relief wells entered the original borehole, specialized liquids were pumped into the original well to stop the flow. Operation of the relief wells began in August 2010. The original well was declared effectively dead on September 19, 2010.
The economic and environmental impact of this spill will be felt for many years. Many people rely on the Gulf for their livelihoods or for recreation. Commercial fishing, tourism, and oil-related jobs are the economic engines of the region. Fearing contamination, NOAA imposed a fishing ban on approximately one-third of the Gulf (Figure below). Tourism is down in the region as beach goers find other ways to spend their time. Real estate prices along the Gulf have declined precipitously.
This was the extent of the banned area on June 21, 2010.
The toll on wildlife is felt throughout the Gulf. Plankton, which form the base of the food chain, are killed by the oil, leaving other organisms without food. Islands and marshlands around the Gulf have many species that are already at risk, including four endangered species of sea turtles. With such low numbers, rebuilding their populations after the spill will be difficult.
The Gulf of Mexico is one of only two places in the world where bluefin tuna spawn and they are also already endangered. Marine mammals in the Gulf may come up into the slick as they come to the surface to breathe.
Eight national parks and seashores are found along the Gulf shores. Other locations may be ecologically sensitive habitats such as mangroves or marshlands.
There is still oil on beaches and in sediment on the seafloor in the region. Chemicals from the oil dispersants are still in the water. In October 2011 a report was issued that showed that whales and dolphins are dying in the Gulf at twice their normal rate. The long-term effects will be with us for a long time.
- As oil becomes scarcer, there are economic incentives to drill in deeper water, but this is a technologically difficult undertaking.
- There are still chemicals in the water that cause damage to wildlife.
- Massive amounts of oil that have been spilled into a water body can be removed, contained, or dispersed. These actions are difficult and may have negative consequences.
- Birds or beaches coated with oil are the most visible evidence of a spill, but there are many consequences that we can't see, like oil on the seabed or chemical dispersants in the water.
Use the resource below to answer the questions that follow.
- What were the causes of the Exxon Valdez disaster?
- What were the oil industry's response plans?
- What was the industry's response actually?
- What were chemical dispersants used for?
- What were the concerns brought about by the use of chemical dispersants?
- How much of the oil was recovered?
- Who was assigned responsibility for the spill? What was lost?
- When plan for the Alaska pipeline was drawn up, how was the environment to be protected? What was the mistake made by the state?
- What happened when the state passed its own safety law?
- How did the passage of ships change from when the oil first was passing through the area to when the Exxon Valdez spill happened?
- What was supposed to be done during the time the ship was going through the channel, who was supposed to do it, and what was actually happening?
- What was the long-term damage?
- What are the safeties now in place?
- What does it mean that the offense got ahead of the defense in the Gulf of Mexico?
- How had cleanup changed in two decades?
- Have we really learned the lessons of Exxon Valdez and Gulf of Mexico spills?
- What precautions should be made to be sure that there is little chance of negative consequences from an oil spill?
- How do chemical dispersants work? Should they always be used?
- What are the long-term effects of a major oil spill?