<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1; url=/nojavascript/"> Reducing Ozone Destruction ( Read ) | Earth Science | CK-12 Foundation
Dismiss
Skip Navigation
You are viewing an older version of this Concept. Go to the latest version.

Reducing Ozone Destruction

%
Progress
Practice Reducing Ozone Destruction
Practice
Progress
%
Practice Now
Reducing Ozone Destruction

What would have happened if CFCs had not been phased out?

Had CFCs not been phased out, by 2050 there would have been 10 times more skin cancer cases than in 1980. The result would have been about 20 million more cases of skin cancer in the United States and 130 million cases globally.

Reducing Ozone Destruction

One success story in reducing pollutants that harm the atmosphere concerns ozone-destroying chemicals. In 1973, scientists calculated that CFCs could reach the stratosphere and break apart. This would release chlorine atoms, which would then destroy ozone. Based only on their calculations, the United States and most Scandinavian countries banned CFCs in spray cans in 1978.

More confirmation that CFCs break down ozone was needed before more was done to reduce production of ozone-destroying chemicals. In 1985, members of the British Antarctic Survey reported that a 50% reduction in the ozone layer had been found over Antarctica in the previous three springs.

The Montreal Protocol

Two years after the British Antarctic Survey report, the "Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer" was ratified by nations all over the world.

The Montreal Protocol controls the production and consumption of 96 chemicals that damage the ozone layer ( Figure below ). Hazardous substances are phased out first by developed nations and one decade later by developing nations. More hazardous substances are phased out more quickly. CFCs have been mostly phased out since 1995, although were used in developing nations until 2010. Some of the less hazardous substances will not be phased out until 2030. The Protocol also requires that wealthier nations donate money to develop technologies that will replace these chemicals.

Ozone levels over North America decreased between 1974 and 2009. Models of the future predict what ozone levels would have been if CFCs were not being phased out. Warmer colors indicate more ozone.

Since CFCs take many years to reach the stratosphere and can survive there a long time before they break down, the ozone hole will probably continue to grow for some time before it begins to shrink. The ozone layer will reach the same levels it had before 1980 around 2068 and 1950 levels in one or two centuries.

Summary

  • Calculations of ozone destruction prompted governments to ban some CFCs in 1978.
  • The Montreal Protocol protects the ozone layer by regulating the production and consumption of ozone-destroying chemicals.
  • Ozone levels continue to decrease, but the ozone hole will eventually begin to get smaller.

Practice

Use this resource to answer the questions that follow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnp0YU3u1r4

1. What problems can overexposure to UV light cause?

2. When was the Montreal Protocol signed?

3. What has been phased out due to the Montreal Protocol?

4. How long will it take the ozone to recover?

5. When will HCFCs be phased out?

6. Explain why the Montreal Protocol has been successful.

7. What company has spent $40 million researching clean cooling technology?

Review

1. How did mathematical calculations and observations of depletion of ozone over Antarctica prompt society to act to protect the ozone layer?

2. What is the Montreal Protocol?

3. Why doesn't the ozone hole repair itself now that CFCs are banned?

Image Attributions

Explore More

Sign in to explore more, including practice questions and solutions for Reducing Ozone Destruction.

Reviews

Please wait...
Please wait...

Original text